Principles of the network
Principles of the network
Our approach to collaboration and alliances with other organisations – June 2020
The Network of Regional Youth Work Units: England brings together independent organisations working to support the youth sector at regional level in the English regions. At present our members cover 6 of the 9 regions and we aim to recruit relevant organisations to join the network and support youth work in the other 3 regions over the next 1-2 years.
Regional Youth Work Units act as hubs for developing and supporting youth work in their regions, working with commissioners, providers and young people themselves to ensure the sector is well-informed, skilled and responsive to changes in government policies and young people’s needs.
The Network regularly works with organisations with a national (and sometimes international) footprint and role in supporting aspects of the work of the youth sector, in order to inform policy developments, engage parts of the youth sector who may otherwise not be able to access national initiatives and knowledge, and provide regional intelligence to national organisations while informing organisations in the region of national developments that could affect their practice and environment. This role is recognised and valued by national organisations and government bodies, and has resulted in positive outcomes for youth work, youth workers and young people.
Our approach to collaboration and alliances with other organisations – June 2020
The Network of Regional Youth Work Units: England brings together independent organisations working to support the youth sector at regional level in the English regions. At present our members cover 6 of the 9 regions and we aim to recruit relevant organisations to join the network and support youth work in the other 3 regions over the next 1-2 years.
Regional Youth Work Units act as hubs for developing and supporting youth work in their regions, working with commissioners, providers and young people themselves to ensure the sector is well-informed, skilled and responsive to changes in government policies and young people’s needs.
The Network regularly works with organisations with a national (and sometimes international) footprint and role in supporting aspects of the work of the youth sector, in order to inform policy developments, engage parts of the youth sector who may otherwise not be able to access national initiatives and knowledge, and provide regional intelligence to national organisations while informing organisations in the region of national developments that could affect their practice and environment. This role is recognised and valued by national organisations and government bodies, and has resulted in positive outcomes for youth work, youth workers and young people.

.png)

Youth Matters - Regional data for young people
1. Introduction and Context
The National Youth Strategy, Youth Matters, outlines a ten-year vision to ensure every young person has access to safe spaces, caring adults, and a sense of belonging. A core pillar of this strategy is the shift "From National to Local," recognizing that decisions and funding are most effective when placed closer to the communities they serve.
This briefing analyses data from a robust, nationally representative sample of 14,134 young people". The data reveals that while young people share a "triad of anxiety" regarding education, social life, and finances, their specific needs, ranging from affordable transport in the South West to safe public spaces in the Midlands, vary significantly by location. This analysis highlights critical regional nuances that must inform the implementation of the Youth Matters strategy, ensuring that the "London Effect" does not skew national policy design.
2. The regional variation for young people
Theme 1: Civic Voice, Empowerment, and Belonging
The strategy aims to move young people from "Excluded to Empowered," including the introduction of votes at 16. However, the data indicates a stark regional divide in political confidence and civic knowledge.
-
Question: "I feel like my voice matters for decisions made in my country"
-
National Context: This metric shows the highest disenfranchisement; nearly half (49%) of young people disagree that their voice matters in their country.
-
The "London Effect": There is a massive 16 percentage point gap between London (37% agree) and the South East (21% agree) regarding whether their voice matters nationally. This confirms that proximity to the seat of government significantly correlates with feeling heard.
-
-
Question: "I know how to influence decisions made in my local area"
-
Civic Knowledge Gaps: While civic knowledge is evenly split nationally (34% agree vs. 34% disagree), the North East is a notable negative outlier. It has the lowest agreement (29%) and the highest level of uncertainty (15% "Not Sure"), suggesting a specific lack of civic education in that area compared to the neighboring North West (37% agree).
-
-
Question: "I feel like I belong with the people in my local area"
-
Belonging vs. Alienation: Despite political disaffection, 51% of young people agree they feel a sense of belonging locally. Londoners report the highest sense of belonging (56%), challenging the stereotype of urban alienation. In contrast, the South West reports the lowest belonging (47%).
-
Theme 2: Access to Services, Infrastructure, and Activities
The strategy identifies that "less than half" of young people are happy with local activities. The regional data confirms this, showing that satisfaction is heavily dependent on urban infrastructure.
-
Question: "I know how to find volunteering opportunities in my local area"
-
The Volunteering Divide: Knowledge of volunteering opportunities is generally healthy (45% agree). However, urban strength is evident: London leads (51%) and the North West is a close second (48%), while rural areas like the South West and South East score the lowest (42%), indicating a struggle to find opportunities outside major population centers.
-
-
Question: "Which of the following would you most like to have more access to in your local area?" (Top 1 / Top 3 / Top 5)
-
Transport (Top 1 Priority): The South West rates "Affordable public transport" as its joint-highest priority (12%) in "Top 1" polling, whereas London rates it as its lowest priority (7%). This highlights the disparity between the capital's connected infrastructure and rural connectivity challenges.
-
Sport (Top 1 Priority): London is the only region where "Sport and exercise" (12%) is the clear standout winner in "Top 1" priorities. In "Top 5" polling, London ties for the highest score in sport (38%) compared to just 29% in the North East, suggesting active recreation is a unique priority for young Londoners.
-
Green Spaces (Top 3 Priority): The East Midlands and South West (both 31%) prioritize green spaces most heavily in "Top 3" polling, while the North East prioritizes them least (25%).
-
-
Question: "I feel like the activities and services in my local area are made for young people like me"
-
Relevance: Nationally, only 37% agree services are designed for them. London (45%) is the only region where significantly more young people agree than disagree.
-
Theme 3: Safety, Wellbeing, and Support
Safety is a complex issue; while online safety confidence is high, the desire for safe physical spaces is the single most requested improvement nationwide.
-
Question: "Which of the following would you most like to have more access to in your local area?" (Focus: Safety)
-
The Safety Nuance: When forced to choose just one priority, "Safe and accessible public spaces" drops to 10% (tied for first), but when allowed five choices, it becomes the clear standalone winner at 43%. This suggests that while safety is a widespread concern, it isn't always the single most urgent immediate need compared to tangible facilities like parks or gyms.
-
London vs. The North on Safety: Only 38% of Londoners prioritize safe public spaces in their "Top 5," compared to 46% in the North West, Yorkshire, and the Midlands—an 8-point deficit that suggests safety is a more pressing concern outside the capital.
-
-
Question: "Trusted Adult Qualities" (Contextual Question)
-
Trusted Adult Traits: Opinions on trusted adults are highly fragmented. The North East places the highest premium on "Reliability" (12%) and "Trust" (14%), valuing consistency above other traits, while the West Midlands and South East place slightly higher value on adults who "Communicate well".
-
-
Question: "I know enough to stay safe online"
-
Online Safety Gap: London (74%) falls significantly behind the rest of the country in online safety confidence, particularly compared to the East of England (83%), potentially reflecting a more complex digital environment in the capital.
-
Theme 4: Economic Security and Future Skills
The strategy acknowledges that it is hard for youth to focus on the future when their present is insecure. The data strongly reinforces that the cost of living is the dominant concern.
-
Question: "Improve Day-to-Day Life" (Contextual Priority Question)
-
The East Midlands Anomaly: While "Lower living costs" is the top priority for improving life nationally (61%), the East Midlands is a fascinating outlier where only 52% selected it. Instead, "Better mental health support" is a massive priority there (40%), scoring higher than in any other region.
-
-
Question: "If I needed/wanted it, I could get help and advice about my education and career"
-
The "London Reverse" in Career Support: Nationally, access to career help is high (76%). However, London scores the lowest in the country (72%), while the North West and East Midlands score the highest (79%). This indicates that while Londoners feel heard politically, they feel less supported in education/career advice than their regional peers.
-
-
Question: "Issues Worried About"
-
Triad of Anxiety: When grouped, "School and Career issues" are the single biggest stressor, affecting 76% of young people. Individually, "School," "Friendships," and "Money" create a "triad of anxiety," each polling closely around 41-42%.
-
3. Discussion: Strategic Alignment
The "London Effect" masks significant regional struggles. A "one-size-fits-all" approach will fail to address the specific transport deficits in the South West, the mental health crisis in the East Midlands, or the safety concerns in the North. To succeed, the Youth Matters delivery mechanism must be intensely local.
-
Addressing the "Transport Gap": The strategy’s promise to "limit on the price of bus fares until March 2027" and improve local bus services directly addresses the acute need in the South West and Yorkshire, where transport is a top-tier priority.
-
Closing the "Sport Gap": The goal to "halve the gap in who gets to do activities" directly supports London's high demand for sport and exercise facilities, which remains a primary unfulfilled need for young Londoners.
-
Solving the "Trust Deficit": The commitment to recruit "half a million more" trusted adults is critical for the North East, where reliability and trust are valued most highly but civic confidence is lowest.
-
Mental Health Targeting: The rollout of "Mental Health Support Teams in schools" is particularly vital for the East Midlands, the only region where mental health support rivals cost of living as a top priority.
